...the one-stop source for news, hot topics, and active conversations in the adult industry for webmasters and industry professionals. Now you can surf on to one website, check multiple industry message boards and news portals in the matter of a few seconds and decide which topics, if any, capture your interest. We only aggregate the most relevant and active threads and topics using a combination of technology.
We are getting ready to launch oure first gay paysite.
I am thinking about build some free sites for LL owners to use on their sites. But the question is do LL owners use free hosted free sites ?
Read more at: greenguyandjim.com
As of today, I will no longer accept free sites using blind recips.
Thank you for understanding and keep the good stuff coming
Read more at: greenguyandjim.com
I noticed that the rules for LOR’s regular submitters don’t allow for private whois, how common is this?
I have private whois on my main domain as I really don’t want anyone at my day job to know what I’m doing on my own time, and more importantly they’d probably fire me if they found out I had porn sites. They’re very conservative asswipes, but they pay well. You do what you gotta do to pay the bills…
Anyway, am I going to have problems getting sites listed with a private whois?
Thanks!
Read more at: greenguyandjim.com
I got into a Build-a-Thon over on another board over the weekend, and had a challenge to build a free site using 2 sponsors that hand out pretty darned good content. I needed to build more.. so I did. Problem I had was I only found 2 galleries worth of so-so material (Originally only 20 pics) that I sort of like. The site was supposed to represent both sponsors, so, I did a movie clip page with 4-30 second clips. The gallery was clearly labeled as a movie gallery, too.
About half the sites I submitted the 3 gallery version to accepted it. Then I got a rejection notice from LOR that they don’t accept mixed media – pics or clips, but not both. It isn’t in the rules, but hey, I can respect that… I quickly built a clone, submitted a 24 picture, 2 gallery version, and all seem to be happy.
Now, with just about every single sponsor out there offering pics and movies on their trailers and FHGs, what is the big issue here? Is it so wrong to want to update a minimum-content site with a bit more, especially when it represents the second sponsor? Is this a trend I want to stay away from? Do pics only or clips only, but never both?
Sigh.. so many questions, and it is only Monday!
Read more at: greenguyandjim.com
I’ve been getting some well designed easy on the eyes submits to my list, but the English is truely incomprehensible. Even the 2257 info reads like bablefish on a bad day.
One side of me says "fuck it, it’s porn and people want to see sex, not read about sex…"
But then I don’t want to confuse surfers, and there may even be a search engine consideration.
Just wanted to get some input from folks that have been listing for a while…
Read more at: greenguyandjim.com